Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

--- an_indiv:0769 [2024/07/17 20:25] – xaverkainzbauer
+++ an_indiv:0769 [2024/11/23 18:05] (aktuell) – xaverkainzbauer
@@ Zeile 1: / Zeile 1: @@
-[[cento:centologia#centones_antiphonarum|🔘]] [[grad:0017|IN]] [[grad:0174|GR]] [[grad:0465|TR]] [[grad:0325|AL]] [[grad:0480|OF]] [[grad:0603|CO]]
+[[cento:centologia#centones_antiphonarum|🔘]]  [[grad:0017|IN]] [[grad:0174|GR]] [[grad:0465|TR]] [[grad:0325|AL]] [[grad:0480|OF]] [[grad:0603|CO]]
 <fc #ffffff>xxxxx</fc>
 ✅ [[0019|2️⃣]] [[0008|0️⃣]] [[0034|3️⃣]] [[0113|4️⃣]] [[0006|5️⃣]] [[0158|6️⃣]] [[0007|7️⃣]] [[0004|8️⃣]]
 <fc #ffffff>xxxxx</fc>
-**<fc #BD0C11>AN</fc>** [[7009|RP]] [[9862|IV]]  [[alia:alia|alia]]
+**<fc #BD0C11>AN</fc>** [[ant:7009|RP]] [[ant:9862|IV]]  [[alia:alia|alia]]
 ------------------
@@ Zeile 9: / Zeile 9: @@
 {%syn:title:ant:0769%}
-[[ant:0769|↖️]]
-{{ :ant:0769_comm.png?300|}}
+[[0764]] ⟽ **[[cento_an:1typ|AN 1]]** ⟾ [[0776]]
+[[ant:0769|⏹️]] [[rp_hmr:0769|🔄]]
+-------
+{{ :ant:0769_comm.png?300|}}
 **[[cento_an:1inc_5pes#6|1INC 5Pes]]** gleich [[ant:0769]] <fc #4682b4>"**Vá**-do **ád** patrem meum"</fc>.\\
-**[[formulae:supra|FML supra]]** cf.: **1MED triv**.\\
+**[[formulae:supra#3|FML supra]]** cf.: **1MED triv**.\\
-**[[formulae:digit|FML digit]]** \\
+**[[formulae:digit#1|FML digit]]** \\
-**[[cento_an:1med_triv|1MED triv]]** incipiens cum [[formulae:circulatio]].\\
+**[[cento_an:1med_triv#2acc2|1MED triv]]** eröffnet mit [[formulae:circulatio]], daher der Hauptakzent <fc #4682b4>"**fác** me //síc//ut únum"</fc>\\
-**[[cento_an:1ter_de3|1TER de3]]**\\
+**[[cento_an:1ter_de3#1|1TER de3]]**\\
 <fc #4682b4>"Vádo //ád// patrem"</fc> Der zweite, höhere Akzent übersteigt den ersten nur wenig. Die Rezitation "la" wird zweimal zum "sol" abgesenkt, und bereitet **FML supra vor**\\
@@ Zeile 25: / Zeile 27: @@
 **1FML quia** verstanden werden (vgl. z.B.: [[ant:0216]]). Tatsächlich ist sie eine völlig nk [[formulae:circulatio]], auf zwei Silben aufgeteilt. Im Kern ist der Cento ein 1MED triv 2acc\.
 -------
 ● Ich gehe zu meinem Vater und sage zu ihm:\\
 Vater, mache mich zu einem deiner Tagelöhner.
@@ Zeile 32: / Zeile 33: @@
 Father, make me one of your day labourers.\\
 -------
+{{ :ant:0769_comm.png?300|}}
+**[[cento_an:1inc_5pes#6|1INC 5Pes]]** equal to [[ant:0769]] <fc #4682b4>"**Vá**-do **ád** patrem meum"</fc>.\\
+**[[formulae:supra#3|FML supra]]** cf: **1MED triv**.\\
+**[[formulae:digit#1|FML digit]]** \\
+**[[cento_an:1med_triv#2acc2|1MED triv]]** opens with [[formulae:circulatio]], hence the main accent <fc #4682b4>"**fác** me //síc//ut únum"</fc>\\
+**[[cento_an:1ter_de3#1|1TER de3]]**\\
+<fc #4682b4>"Vádo //ád// patrem"</fc> The second, higher accent only slightly exceeds the first. The recitation "la" is lowered twice to "sol", and prepares **FML supra pre**\\\
+"pater" Why digitus here? The prodigal son is a beggar, but also a son, he is not entitled to **FML alloq** in this situation, but **FML digitus** is not instructing, but is certainly calling for attention. He is only asking:\\
+<fc #4682b4>//fác// me unum ex mercennariis"</fc>. The word "fac" is once again a figure that transcends cento boundaries: on the one hand, it places an accent on the syneresis of the 1MED melody (cf. [[ant:0636]]); on the other hand, it can also be understood as\\\
+**1FML quia** (cf. e.g.: [[ant:0216]]). In fact, it is a completely nk [[formulae:circulatio]], divided into two syllables. At its core, cento is a 1MED triv 2acc\.\\
 -------
 {%syn:analyse:ant:0769%}