Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

--- gr_indiv:0426 [2026/04/02 13:28] – xaverkainzbauer
+++ gr_indiv:0426 [2026/04/02 13:32] (aktuell) – xaverkainzbauer
@@ Zeile 6: / Zeile 6: @@
 ------------------
 [[0420]] ← → [[0427]]
 {%syn:title:grad:0426%}
 [[0406]] ⟽ **[[cento_gr:cento_al#alleluia_1_typos|AL 1]]** ⟾ [[0439|0439a]]\\
 [[grad:1778]] ⟽ **[[cento_gr:cento_al#al_1f|AL 1f]]**           ⟾ [[grad:0865]]
@@ Zeile 27: / Zeile 27: @@
   V. Risen from the grave is the Most High / who hung on the cross for us.
-<fc #4682b4>"Jubilus" : Pressus"sol-mi"</fc>: One of the few places where a higher note follows the pressus! In the Repetenda this resupint is missing. The probability of a scribal error in E is very low. The resupin movement is to be interpreted as a signal for the end of the jubilee. The repetenda does not end, it leads to the repetition of the jubilus.
+Composed around 850, the Repetenda is the full Iubilus. In the \\
+**Versus** there is a three-syllable repetition: **sepulchro = pependit**. Death and suffering are juxtaposed.\\
+The Iubilus and Versus begin with the 1INC ad5 of the AN; the first accent is the primary accent. ‘Allelúia’ with the reinforcing Prr-graphic,
+‘Súrrexít’ with the two-accented form to “do”, which, however, does not exceed the fifth on the first accent and brings the ‘do’ to the final syllable.\\
+A short phrase is repeated and varied twice; in the Iubilus it is lowered by a step and continued, in the Versus it remains at the same pitch but continues to ‘do’ instead of ‘mi’.\\
+A distinctive feature of this AL is the juxtaposition of fifth intervals: \\
+Jubilus: ‘re-la’ against ‘do-sol’\\
+Versus: ‘re-la’ against ‘mi-si’ and again ‘la-re’.\\
+<fc #4682b4>“Jubilus” : Pressus ‘sol-mi’</fc>: One of the few places where a higher note follows the Pressus! This resupinton is missing in the Repetenda. The likelihood of a copying error in E is very low. The resupin movement is to be interpreted as a signal for the end of the Jubilus. The Repetenda does not end here; it leads to a repetition of the Jubilus.\\
+<fc #4682b4>‘Surre-//xit//’</fc> The ‘si’ is the upper note of the triad ‘mi-sol-si’, difficult to hit in this context, but no more so than ‘sa’. The text “surrexit” also points to ‘si’. The diastematic sources alter this passage completely.
 -------
 {%syn:analyse:grad:0426%}