| Beide Seiten der vorigen RevisionVorhergehende Überarbeitung | |
| an_indiv:0897 [2024/11/23 22:17] – xaverkainzbauer | an_indiv:0897 [2026/06/23 21:35] (aktuell) – xaverkainzbauer |
|---|
| [[cento:centologia#centones_antiphonarum|🔘]] [[grad:0011|IN]] [[grad:0165|GR]] [[grad:0465|TR]] [[grad:0323|AL]] [[grad:0479|OF]] [[grad:0613|CO]] | [[cento:centologia#centones_antiphonarum|🔘]] [[grad:0011|IN]] [[grad:0165|GR]] [[grad:0465|TR]] [[grad:0323|AL]] [[grad:0479|OF]] [[grad:0613|CO]] <fc #ffffff>xxxxx</fc> |
| <fc #ffffff>xxxxx</fc> | |
| [[0001|1️⃣]] ✅ [[0008|0️⃣]] [[0034|3️⃣]] [[0113|4️⃣]] [[0006|5️⃣]] [[0158|6️⃣]] [[0007|7️⃣]] [[0004|8️⃣]] | [[0001|1️⃣]] ✅ [[0008|0️⃣]] [[0034|3️⃣]] [[0113|4️⃣]] [[0006|5️⃣]] [[0158|6️⃣]] [[0007|7️⃣]] [[0004|8️⃣]] |
| <fc #ffffff>xxxxx</fc> | <fc #ffffff>xxxxx</fc> **<fc #BD0C11>AN</fc>** [[ant:7002|RP]] [[ant:9862|IV]] [[alia:alia|alia]] |
| **<fc #BD0C11>AN</fc>** [[ant:7002|RP]] [[ant:9862|IV]] [[alia:alia|alia]] | |
| ------------------ | ------------------ |
| |
| [[0896]] ← → [[0898]] | [[0896]] ← → [[0898]] |
| |
| {%syn:title:ant:0897%} | {%syn:title:ant:0897%} |
| | [[0894]] ⟽ **[[cento_an:2typ|AN 2]]** ⟾ [[0905]] <fc #ffffff>xxxxx</fc> |
| [[0894]] ⟽ **[[cento_an:2typ|AN 2]]** ⟾ [[0905]] | |
| [[ant:0897|↖️]] [[rp_hmr:0897|🔄]] | [[ant:0897|↖️]] [[rp_hmr:0897|🔄]] |
| ------- | ------- |
| **[[cento_an:3ter#comma|DT comma]]**\\ | **[[cento_an:3ter#comma|DT comma]]**\\ |
| **[[cento_an:2ter_brv#2|2TER brv]]** | **[[cento_an:2ter_brv#2|2TER brv]]** |
| ------- | |
| ● Mein Gott, rette mich aus der Hand des Frevlers. | |
| |
| ● My God, save me from the hand of the wicked.\\ | Mein Gott, rette mich aus der Hand des Frevlers. |
| ------- | |
| | My God, save me from the hand of the wicked. |
| **[[cento_an:2inc_cad#2|1INC cad]]** ad "do": [[formulae:colon]] +\\ | **[[cento_an:2inc_cad#2|1INC cad]]** ad "do": [[formulae:colon]] +\\ |
| [[formulae:pecl#pot|FML potentiae]] The question here is whether the nkPes <fc #4682b4>"//e//-ripe"</fc> should not be a pes "re-fa" as usual in the formula. The diastematic sources all write "mi-fa". This is possibly supported by the fact that a new word begins on the pes, whereas in all other cases Clm + pes are on the last two syllables of a word. On the other hand, the antiphon text is virtually predestined for an FML potentiae: <fc #4682b4>"Deus meus eripe me"</fc> Note also the speck of dirt in T1 ! The solution pes "mi-fa" could be attributed to the West Frankish plerosis.\\ | [[formulae:pecl#pot|FML potentiae]] The question here is whether the nkPes <fc #4682b4>"//e//-ripe"</fc> should not be a pes "re-fa" as usual in the formula. The diastematic sources all write "mi-fa". This is possibly supported by the fact that a new word begins on the pes, whereas in all other cases Clm + pes are on the last two syllables of a word. On the other hand, the antiphon text is virtually predestined for an FML potentiae: <fc #4682b4>"Deus meus eripe me"</fc> Note also the speck of dirt in T1 ! The solution pes "mi-fa" could be attributed to the West Frankish plerosis.\\ |
