Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

--- an_indiv:0582 [2024/06/02 07:33] – xaverkainzbauer
+++ an_indiv:0582 [2024/11/20 21:52] (aktuell) – xaverkainzbauer
@@ Zeile 1: / Zeile 1: @@
-[[cento:centologia#centones_antiphonarum|🔘]]  [[grad:0002|IN]] [[grad:0176|GR]] [[grad:0456|TR]] [[grad:0324|AL]] [[grad:0482|OF]] [[grad:0615|CO]]
+[[cento:centologia#centones_antiphonarum|🔘]]  [[grad:0011|IN]] [[grad:0165|GR]] [[grad:0465|TR]] [[grad:0323|AL]] [[grad:0479|OF]] [[grad:0613|CO]]
 <fc #ffffff>xxxxx</fc>
-[[0001|1️⃣]] ✅ [[0008|0️⃣]] [[0034|3️⃣]] [[0113|4️⃣]] [[0006|5️⃣]] [[0158|6️⃣]] [[0007|7️⃣]]  [[0004|8️⃣]]
+[[0001|1️⃣]] ✅ [[0008|0️⃣]] [[0034|3️⃣]] [[0113|4️⃣]] [[0006|5️⃣]] [[0158|6️⃣]] [[0007|7️⃣]] [[0004|8️⃣]]
 <fc #ffffff>xxxxx</fc>
-**<fc #BD0C11>AN</fc>** [[ant:7001|RP]] [[ant:9815|IV]]  [[alia:alia|alia]]
+**<fc #BD0C11>AN</fc>** [[ant:7002|RP]] [[ant:9862|IV]]  [[alia:alia|alia]]
 ------------------
@@ Zeile 9: / Zeile 9: @@
 {%syn:title:ant:0582%}
-[[ant:0582|↖️]]
+[[0565]] ⟽ **[[cento_an:2typ|AN 2]]** ⟾ [[0590]]
+[[ant:0582|⏹️]]
+------
+.Periode 1.modus - 2.Periode 2.modus
+**[[cento_an:1inc_vrgstr|1INC VrgStr]]** vermischt mit:\\
+**[[cento_an:1inc_ad4|1INC ad4]]** \\
+**[[cento_an:1med_triv#din|1MED triv]]** 1acc de infra. +
+[[formulae:pecl#clmcl|FML ClmCl]] \\
+**[[cento_an:2inc_ad3#m|2INC ad3]]** 2acc M<fc #4682b4> "sal-//vá//-tor //nós//-ter"</fc>\\
+**[[cento_an:8ter_katab|8TER katab]]** Das Wort <fc #4682b4>"hódie"</fc> erhält durch die katabasis ein starkes Gewicht.\\
+**[[cento_an:2ter_typ|2TER typ]]** acc.ult. mi/fa? Wc solo "fa" (do-Revision), kein Bv, Tol "mi", das ist für Tol nicht ungewöhnlich. Bleibt die Frage nach dem Gewicht des Akzentes "salvator noster hodie nasci dig**ná**tus est": Nach den Akzenten <fc #4682b4>"**hó**die **nás**ci"</fc> kann <fc #4682b4>"dignatus est"</fc> nur zweitrangig sein. Die lange Virga in MR spricht allerdings für "fa".
 -------
@@ Zeile 19: / Zeile 31: @@
 ● Born before the morning star, and before all time, the Lord,\\
 our Saviour, has appeared to the world today
+-------
+st period 1st mode - 2nd period 2nd mode
+**[[cento_an:1inc_vrgstr|1INC VrgStr]]** mixed with:\\
+**[[cento_an:1inc_ad4|1INC ad4]]** \\
+**[[cento_an:1med_triv#din|1MED triv]]** 1acc de infra. +
+[[formulae:pecl#clmcl|FML ClmCl]] \\
+**[[cento_an:2inc_ad3#m|2INC ad3]]** 2acc M<fc #4682b4> "sal-//vá//-tor //nós//-ter"</fc>\\\
+**[[cento_an:8ter_katab|8TER katab]]** The word <fc #4682b4>"hódie"</fc> is given a strong weight by the katabasis.\\
+**[[cento_an:2ter_typ|2TER type]]** acc.ult. mi/fa? Wc solo "fa" (do revision), no Bv, Tol "mi", which is not unusual for Tol. The question remains as to the weight of the accent "salvator noster hodie nasci dig**ná**tus est": After the accents <fc #4682b4>"**hó**die **nás**ci"</fc>, <fc #4682b4>"dignatus est"</fc> can only be secondary. The long virga in MR, however, speaks in favour of "fa".
+-------
+{%syn:analyse:ant:0582%}