Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

--- gr_indiv:0600 [2026/03/17 12:29] – xaverkainzbauer
+++ gr_indiv:0600 [2026/03/17 12:58] (aktuell) – xaverkainzbauer
@@ Zeile 5: / Zeile 5: @@
 [[0599]] ← → [[0601]]
 {%syn:title:grad:0600%}  [[0599]] ⟽ **[[cento_gr:cento_co4|CO 4]]** ⟾ [[0611]] <fc #ffffff>xxx</fc>
-[[grad:0600|⏹️]]\\
+[[grad:0600|⏹️]] <fc #ffffff>xxx</fc> GT 309 - BzG 41.42/31 + GrN 1/292
--------
-GT 309 - BzG 41.42/31 + GrN 1/292
 {{ :gr_indiv:0600_et_holo-.png?150|}}
@@ Zeile 20: / Zeile 18: @@
   burnt offerings and whole offerings, on your altar, Lord.
+{{ :gr_indiv:0600_et_holo-.png?150|}}
+<fc #4682b4>‘//et// holocausta’</fc> The GN relies solely on Bv34 for its semitone clivis. Bv33 could also be read this way, but Bv35 notates a third clivis, and Bv33 even a fifth (la-re). The following argues against the semitone pes:\\
+**E** writes mediocriter regarding the lower note; this is not a fourth, but above all, it is not a second. If a semitone were intended here, W would write sursum regarding the lower note.\\
+**MR** the pes disgregatus on the syllable ‘et //ho//-locaustum’ requires a lower note on ‘et’ beforehand.
 -------
 {%syn:analyse:grad:0600%}