Unterschiede
Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.
| Beide Seiten der vorigen RevisionVorhergehende ÜberarbeitungNächste Überarbeitung | Vorhergehende Überarbeitung |
| gr_indiv:0599 [2026/03/17 12:08] – xaverkainzbauer | gr_indiv:0599 [2026/03/17 12:54] (aktuell) – xaverkainzbauer |
|---|
| ------------------ | ------------------ |
| [[0840]] ← → [[0600]] | [[0840]] ← → [[0600]] |
| {%syn:title:grad:0599%} [[xxxx]] ⟽ **[[cento_gr:cento_co4|CO 4]]** ⟾ [[0600]] <fc #ffffff>xxx</fc> [[grad:0599|⏹️]]<fc #ffffff>xxx</fc> GT 113 - BzG 53/37 + GrN 2/63 | {%syn:title:grad:0599%} [[0755]] ⟽ **[[cento_gr:cento_co4|CO 4]]** ⟾ [[0600]] <fc #ffffff>xxx</fc> [[grad:0599|⏹️]]<fc #ffffff>xxx</fc> GT 113 - BzG 53/37 + GrN 2/63 |
| ------- | ------- |
| Die Schlüsselung und das “fa“ ist neu zu denken! | Die Schlüsselung und das “fa“ ist neu zu denken! |
| and spare your servant from strangers. | and spare your servant from strangers. |
| |
| | The key signature and the “F” need to be rethought! |
| |
| | <fc #4682b4>‘et //ab// alienis’</fc> Intonation torculus (over the fifth), the first note of which is, by definition, //so light that it can even be omitted//. All St Gallen manuscripts notate Clivis, L, Mp, Kl torculus. The question “is this a note or not?” is pointless. The portamento towards the Clivis will vary in practice. It is certainly wrong to sing the first note of the Torculus explicitly. The white note does justice to it.\\ |
| | <fc #4682b4>‘et ab alie-//nis//’</fc> Pes subpunctis ‘sol-la-fa-mi’, inferius in E on the third note. Articulation k-k-nk-nk (current-current-not current-not current): (--34).\\ |
| | ❓ ‘<fc #4682b4>tu-//o//’</fc> E Is the equaliter between the pressus and the subsequent 7-step neume? The pressus itself is also open to question here (L!). |
| ------- | ------- |
| {%syn:analyse:grad:0599%} | {%syn:analyse:grad:0599%} |
