Unterschiede
Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.
| Beide Seiten der vorigen RevisionVorhergehende Überarbeitung | |
| gr_indiv:0559 [2025/11/25 11:21] – xaverkainzbauer | gr_indiv:0559 [2025/11/25 11:21] (aktuell) – xaverkainzbauer |
|---|
| |
| |
| <fc #4682b4>“exsul-tet”</fc> The diastematic sources suggest “re, mi, fa” for the first note. The ‘sursum’ in Ch argues against “re,” leaving Bv ‘mi’ and A “fa.” The parallel passage in the second verse “saluta-//re//” does not really help with the decision either (here A+Y “re”). But the complete absence of the solution ‘fa’ (except for Kl do revision) leads to the decision against A and in favor of Bv “mi.” | <fc #4682b4>“exsul-tet”</fc> The diastematic sources suggest “re, mi, fa” for the first note. The ‘sursum’ in Ch argues against “re,” leaving Bv ‘mi’ and A “fa.” The parallel passage in the second verse “saluta-//re//” does not really help with the decision either (here A+Y “re”). But the complete absence of the solution ‘fa’ (except for Kl do revision) leads to the decision against A and in favor of Bv “mi.”\\ |
| <fc #4682b4>“//fa//-ciem”</fc> The melody leads to “si.” Agustoni's rule “si” in relation to “do,” ‘sa’ as an alternating note to “la” applies to the 1st mode, not to the tritus. 5th mode always “si,” especially in relation to the following ‘mi’ in “dominus.” | <fc #4682b4>“//fa//-ciem”</fc> The melody leads to “si.” Agustoni's rule “si” in relation to “do,” ‘sa’ as an alternating note to “la” applies to the 1st mode, not to the tritus. 5th mode always “si,” especially in relation to the following ‘mi’ in “dominus.” |
| ------- | ------- |
| {%syn:analyse:grad:0559%} | {%syn:analyse:grad:0559%} |
