Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

--- gr_indiv:0368 [2026/04/01 13:41] – xaverkainzbauer
+++ gr_indiv:0368 [2026/04/01 13:42] (aktuell) – xaverkainzbauer
@@ Zeile 20: / Zeile 20: @@
   V. The souls of the righteous are in God's hand / and no torment of evil can touch them.
-<fc #4682b4>"flor-//re//-bit"</fc> The illegible littera at the end of the nkPes graph must be read as 'inferius'.\\
+{{ :gr_indiv:0368_synopsis.png?250|}}
-<fc #4682b4>"//ger//-minabit"</fc> The Oriscus means a kind of 'divisio minima', but no further sound.\\
+AL 1a also does not appear in the SX, so it must have been composed around 900. Like AL 1*, it uses the entire AL Iubilus as a Repetenda, but the repetitions within the verse are less clumsy. At its core is an 8-note formula ‘la-do-la-sol-la-sol-fa-la’, in which \\
+**Iubilus**, but with a gap. In the\\
+**verse**, it is also used twice, but with the introduction “fa-sol”. At “et //flo//-rébit”, the ascent to the TrcPAR is extended. On both occasions, a further formula is used which is repeated. In “et flore-” immediately follows “fa-rer-fa-mi-do-re”, whilst the final instance features the ascending sequence “re-mi-fa-sol”, which in the preceding period is set to the text “sic-ut -li-”. Further quotations, repetitions and variants are latent, but difficult to pinpoint with words (grey).\\
+<fc #4682b4>‘flor-//re//-bit’</fc> The illegible letter at the end of the nkPes notation must be read as “inferius”.\\
+<fc #4682b4>‘//ger//-minabit’</fc> The oriscus denotes a kind of “divisio minima”, but no further note.\\
 -------
 {%syn:analyse:grad:0368%}