gr_indiv:0191
Unterschiede
Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.
| Beide Seiten der vorigen RevisionVorhergehende Überarbeitung | |||
| gr_indiv:0191 [2025/10/20 17:49] – xaverkainzbauer | gr_indiv:0191 [2026/06/19 11:24] (aktuell) – xaverkainzbauer | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
| - | [[cento: | + | [[cento: |
| - | <fc # | + | |
| ✅ [[0165|2️⃣]] [[0168|3️⃣]] [[0202|4️⃣]] [[0167|5️⃣]] [[0173|7️⃣]] [[0180|8️⃣]] | ✅ [[0165|2️⃣]] [[0168|3️⃣]] [[0202|4️⃣]] [[0167|5️⃣]] [[0173|7️⃣]] [[0180|8️⃣]] | ||
| - | <fc # | + | <fc # |
| - | [[ant: | + | |
| ------------------ | ------------------ | ||
| [[0190]] ← → [[0192]] | [[0190]] ← → [[0192]] | ||
| Zeile 35: | Zeile 33: | ||
| The situation can be summarized as follows: \\ | The situation can be summarized as follows: \\ | ||
| “do-re” is the original, finely balanced form, which is abandoned in the West Frankish tradition in favor of a more fluid and easier to sing form. L is not to be understood here as West Frankish, but as Lorraine (Saulnier) belonging to a middle tradition. The decision in favor of “do-re” is also supported by the Mi manuscript (9th century), which notes a kind of check mark for the first syllable, a tractulus with a downward stroke (virga) corrected; or is it a shorter virga with episem? | “do-re” is the original, finely balanced form, which is abandoned in the West Frankish tradition in favor of a more fluid and easier to sing form. L is not to be understood here as West Frankish, but as Lorraine (Saulnier) belonging to a middle tradition. The decision in favor of “do-re” is also supported by the Mi manuscript (9th century), which notes a kind of check mark for the first syllable, a tractulus with a downward stroke (virga) corrected; or is it a shorter virga with episem? | ||
| - | |||
| ------- | ------- | ||
| - | |||
| {%syn: | {%syn: | ||
gr_indiv/0191.txt · Zuletzt geändert: von xaverkainzbauer