| Beide Seiten der vorigen RevisionVorhergehende ÜberarbeitungNächste Überarbeitung | Vorhergehende Überarbeitung |
| gr_indiv:0070 [2026/02/16 18:17] – xaverkainzbauer | gr_indiv:0070 [2026/05/01 10:26] (aktuell) – xaverkainzbauer |
|---|
| [[cento:centologia#centones_missalis|🔘]] **<fc #BD0C11>IN</fc>** [[grad:0174|GR]] [[grad:0465|TR]] [[grad:0325|AL]] [[grad:0480|OF]] [[grad:0603|CO]] | [[cento:centologia#centones_missalis|🔘]] **<fc #BD0C11>IN</fc>** [[grad:0174|GR]] [[grad:0465|TR]] [[grad:0325|AL]] [[grad:0480|OF]] [[grad:0603|CO]] <fc #ffffff>xxxxx</fc> |
| <fc #ffffff>xxxxx</fc> | |
| ✅ [[0011|2️⃣]] [[0006|3️⃣]] [[0001|4️⃣]] [[0012|5️⃣]] [[0008|6️⃣]] [[0003|7️⃣]] [[0002|8️⃣]] | ✅ [[0011|2️⃣]] [[0006|3️⃣]] [[0001|4️⃣]] [[0012|5️⃣]] [[0008|6️⃣]] [[0003|7️⃣]] [[0002|8️⃣]] |
| <fc #ffffff>xxxxx</fc> | <fc #ffffff>xxxxx</fc> [[ant:0001|AN]] [[ant:7009|RP]] [[ant:9862|IV]] [[alia:alia|alia]] |
| [[ant:0001|AN]] [[ant:7009|RP]] [[ant:9862|IV]] [[alia:alia|alia]] | |
| ------------------ | ------------------ |
| [[0064]] ← → [[0071]] | [[0064]] ← → [[0071]] |
| {%syn:title:grad:0070%} | {%syn:title:grad:0070%} |
| [[0064]] ⟽ **[[cento_gr:cento_in1|IN 1]]** ⟾ [[0080]] <fc #ffffff>xxx</fc> [[grad:0070|⏹️]] <fc #ffffff>xxx</fc> GT 21 - GN 1/11 - BzG 21/28 | [[0064]] ⟽ **[[cento_gr:cento_in1|IN 1]]** ⟾ [[0080]] <fc #ffffff>xxx</fc> [[grad:0070|⏹️]] <fc #ffffff>xxx</fc> GT 21 - GN 1/11 - BzG 21/28 |
| ------- | ------- |
| <fc #4682b4>"Gau-//de//-te"</fc> Der PorFlx ist völlig kurrent (celeriter), daher unsere Notation mit Puncta. \\ | 4️⃣ **AB - CD - CD - EYF** |
| | |
| | <fc #4682b4>"Gau-//de//-te"</fc> Der PrrFlx ist völlig kurrent (celeriter), daher unsere Notation mit Puncta. \\ |
| <fc #4682b4>"Gaude-//te//"</fc> Der Pes quilismaticus (vulgo: QuilismaScandicus) wird von den Zisterziensern, die grundsätzlich und ausnahmslos auf das Quilisma verzichten, als TerzPes notiert, das Quilisma ist kein Ton. In Ch steht das Oriscuszeichen (= Quilismazeichen) für den Zielton, den Ton //über// dem Leerraum. In allen von uns konsultierten Quellen wird das Quilisma //nur// in Kl als Ton übertragen.\\ | <fc #4682b4>"Gaude-//te//"</fc> Der Pes quilismaticus (vulgo: QuilismaScandicus) wird von den Zisterziensern, die grundsätzlich und ausnahmslos auf das Quilisma verzichten, als TerzPes notiert, das Quilisma ist kein Ton. In Ch steht das Oriscuszeichen (= Quilismazeichen) für den Zielton, den Ton //über// dem Leerraum. In allen von uns konsultierten Quellen wird das Quilisma //nur// in Kl als Ton übertragen.\\ |
| <fc #4682b4>"domi-//no//"</fc> Trc der Wortartikulation. Der erste Ton ist so leicht, dass er sogar entfallen kann; vide: Bv34, A + Y + **Mp** !\\ | <fc #4682b4>"domi-//no//"</fc> Trc der Wortartikulation. Der erste Ton ist so leicht, dass er sogar entfallen kann; vide: Bv34, A + Y + **Mp** !\\ |
| |
| Freut euch im Herrn allezeit / noch einmal sage ich euch: Freut euch! | Freut euch im Herrn allezeit / noch einmal sage ich euch: Freut euch! |
| Eure Güte / soll allen Menschen bekannt werden / Der Herr ist nahe. | Eure Güte / soll allen Menschen bekannt werden / |
| Um nichts sollt ihr in Sorge sein/ sondern bei jedem Gebet / | Der Herr ist nahe / um nichts sollt ihr in Sorge sein / |
| sollen eure Bitten / bekannt werden bei Gott. | sondern bei jedem Gebet / sollen eure Bitten / bekannt werden bei Gott. |
| | |
| Rejoice in the Lord always / once again I say to you: Rejoice! | Rejoice in the Lord always / once again I say to you: Rejoice! |
| Your goodness / shall be known to all people / The Lord is near. | Your goodness / shall be known to all people / |
| You shall not be anxious about anything / but with every prayer / | The Lord is near / You shall not be anxious about anything / |
| our requests / shall be made known to God. | but with every prayer / our requests / shall be made known to God. |
| |
| <fc #4682b4>“Gau-///de//-te”</fc> The PorFlx is completely celeriter, hence our notation with puncta. \\ | <fc #4682b4>“Gau-///de//-te”</fc> The PrrFlx is completely celeriter, hence our notation with puncta. \\ |
| <fc #4682b4>“Gaude-///te//”</fc> The Pes quilismaticus (vulgo: QuilismaScandicus) is notated as a TerzPes by the Cistercians, who generally and without exception do without the quilisma; the quilisma is not a tone. In Ch, the oriscus sign (= quilisma sign) stands for the target tone, the tone //above// the space. In all the sources we consulted, the quilisma //only// is transmitted as a tone in Kl.\\ | <fc #4682b4>“Gaude-///te//”</fc> The Pes quilismaticus (vulgo: QuilismaScandicus) is notated as a TerzPes by the Cistercians, who generally and without exception do without the quilisma; the quilisma is not a tone. In Ch, the oriscus sign (= quilisma sign) stands for the target tone, the tone //above// the space. In all the sources we consulted, the quilisma //only// is transmitted as a tone in Kl.\\ |
| <fc #4682b4>“domi-//no//”</fc> Trc of the word articulation. The first tone is so light that it can even be omitted; vide: Bv34, A + Y + **Mp** !\\ | <fc #4682b4>“domi-//no//”</fc> Trc of the word articulation. The first tone is so light that it can even be omitted; vide: Bv34, A + Y + **Mp** !\\ |
| <fc #4682b4>“vestra”</fc> The fourth ascent “fa-sa” is, typical of the West Franconian tradition, filled up to the 4-tone sca (plerosis), only Kl only leads up to “la” in order to avoid the semitone stress “la-sa” (do revision). | <fc #4682b4>“vestra”</fc> The fourth ascent “fa-sa” is, typical of the West Franconian tradition, filled up to the 4-tone sca (plerosis), only Kl only leads up to “la” in order to avoid the semitone stress “la-sa” (do revision). |
| If, as we are convinced, the quilisma is not a tone (quilisma only in Mp + MR, all others write a tone and not a quilisma, so L ! Ch, A, Y), then Mp + MR remain, which are to be read as a three-step sca “fa-la-sa”, whereby the oriscus indicates that the “sa” leads over the recitation “la”, on which the following syllables continue. However, studies of the responsoria prolixa indicate that the oriscus on the one hand indicates that the retitatzion level has been exceeded, but on the other hand also interprets the qulisma (“sing higher than usual here”) (“sing here //noch// higher than the quilisma already demands”). In addition, L + E require that the following tone “ves-///tra//” be placed under the recitation. | If, as we are convinced, the quilisma is not a tone (quilisma only in Mp + MR, all others write a tone and not a quilisma, so L ! Ch, A, Y), then Mp + MR remain, which are to be read as a three-step sca “fa-la-sa”, whereby the oriscus indicates that the “sa” leads over the recitation “la”, on which the following syllables continue. However, studies of the responsoria prolixa indicate that the oriscus on the one hand indicates that the retitatzion level has been exceeded, but on the other hand also interprets the qulisma (“sing higher than usual here”) (“sing here //noch// higher than the quilisma already demands”). In addition, L + E require that the following tone “ves-///tra//” be placed under the recitation. |
| | {{ :gr_indiv:0070_elision.png?300|}} |
| <fc #4682b4>“no-///ta// sit”</fc> Trc of the word articulation. vide supra.\\ | <fc #4682b4>“no-///ta// sit”</fc> Trc of the word articulation. vide supra.\\ |
| <fc #4682b4>“//om//-nibus”</fc> The Por, which only Zt writes, is prevented by the epiphonus, shortened to Clv, vide Ch ! | <fc #4682b4>“//om//-nibus”</fc> The Por, which only Zt writes, is prevented by the epiphonus, shortened to Clv, vide Ch ! |
| {{ :gr_indiv:0070_elision.png?300|}} | |
| <fc #4682b4>“homi-//ni//-bus”</fc> The graphia in L + Ch stands for an initial “sol” (Trc inito debilis), the following pressus is notated by us as fused. Likewise in “prop__e e__st”, and “sitis”. In “propeest” it is obvious that the contraction cannot/should not be destroyed again by singing the resupin note and the oriscus as two separate notes.\\ | <fc #4682b4>“homi-//ni//-bus”</fc> The graphia in L + Ch stands for an initial “sol” (Trc inito debilis), the following pressus is notated by us as fused. Likewise in “prop__e e__st”, and “sitis”. In “propeest” it is obvious that the contraction cannot/should not be destroyed again by singing the resupin note and the oriscus as two separate notes.\\ |
| <fc #4682b4>“propeest”</fc> Kl Revision to “do”, hence the “sibemolle = sa” in the GT is wrong. The GN has already corrected this.\\ | <fc #4682b4>“propeest”</fc> Kl Revision to “do”, hence the “sibemolle = sa” in the GT is wrong. The GN has already corrected this.\\ |
