gr_indiv:0002
Unterschiede
Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.
| Beide Seiten der vorigen RevisionVorhergehende ÜberarbeitungNächste Überarbeitung | Vorhergehende Überarbeitung | ||
| gr_indiv:0002 [2025/08/02 10:58] – xaverkainzbauer | gr_indiv:0002 [2026/03/30 19:19] (aktuell) – xaverkainzbauer | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
| - | [[cento: | + | [[cento: |
| - | <fc # | + | |
| [[0017|1️⃣]] [[0011|2️⃣]] [[0006|3️⃣]] [[0001|4️⃣]] [[0012|5️⃣]] [[0008|6️⃣]] [[0003|7️⃣]] ✅ | [[0017|1️⃣]] [[0011|2️⃣]] [[0006|3️⃣]] [[0001|4️⃣]] [[0012|5️⃣]] [[0008|6️⃣]] [[0003|7️⃣]] ✅ | ||
| - | <fc # | + | <fc # |
| - | [[ant: | + | |
| ------------------ | ------------------ | ||
| - | |||
| [[0001]] ← → [[0003]] | [[0001]] ← → [[0003]] | ||
| - | |||
| {%syn: | {%syn: | ||
| - | + | [[1255]] / [[0149]] ⟽ **[[cento_gr: | |
| - | [[grad: | + | |
| - | GT 15\\ | + | |
| - | BzG 21/30 - GrN 3 | + | |
| ------- | ------- | ||
| Das Deckblatt vieler codices ist im Laufe der Jahrhunderte Souvenirjägern oder anderen Katastrophen zum Opfer gefallen; die Quellenausbeute für diesen IN ist daher mager. Das alte (falsche) Vorurteil, ein Cephalicus habe immer eine kleine Nebennote zu haben, führte lange Zeit zum fruchtlosen Diskurs, ob das postulierte tiefe " | Das Deckblatt vieler codices ist im Laufe der Jahrhunderte Souvenirjägern oder anderen Katastrophen zum Opfer gefallen; die Quellenausbeute für diesen IN ist daher mager. Das alte (falsche) Vorurteil, ein Cephalicus habe immer eine kleine Nebennote zu haben, führte lange Zeit zum fruchtlosen Diskurs, ob das postulierte tiefe " | ||
| Den IN mit " | Den IN mit " | ||
| - | {{ :grad:0001_ad_te.png?320|}} | + | {{ :gr_indiv:0002_ad_te.png?320|}} |
| Die Silbe " | Die Silbe " | ||
| Zeile 24: | Zeile 17: | ||
| <fc # | <fc # | ||
| [[cento_an: | [[cento_an: | ||
| - | ------- | ||
| - | Zu dir erhob ich meine Seele / Mein Gott, auf dich vertraue ich.\\ | ||
| - | Lass mich nicht zuschanden werden / Lass meine Feinde mich nicht verlachen!\\ | ||
| - | Ja, alle, die auf dich harren / werden nicht zuschanden. | ||
| - | I lift up my soul to you / My God, I trust in you.\\ | + | Zu dir erhob ich meine Seele / Mein Gott, auf dich vertraue ich.\\ |
| - | Do not let me be put to shame / Do not let my enemies laugh at me!\\ | + | Lass mich nicht zuschanden werden / Lass meine Feinde mich nicht verlachen!\\ |
| - | Yes, all who wait for you / will not be put to shame. | + | Ja, alle, die auf dich harren / werden nicht zuschanden. |
| - | ------- | + | |
| + | | ||
| + | Do not let me be put to shame / Do not let my enemies laugh at me!\\ | ||
| + | Yes, all who wait for you / will not be put to shame. | ||
| The cover pages of many codices have fallen victim to souvenir hunters or other disasters over the centuries; the source material for this IN is therefore sparse. The old (false) prejudice that a cephalicus always has a small secondary note led to a long and fruitless debate about whether the postulated low “do” belongs to the syllable “Ad,” to the syllable “te,” or to both. There is no “do.” Kl + Mp, which begin with “sol,” only jump down to “re,” and the rather liquefaction-prone Zt is also very restrained here.\\ | The cover pages of many codices have fallen victim to souvenir hunters or other disasters over the centuries; the source material for this IN is therefore sparse. The old (false) prejudice that a cephalicus always has a small secondary note led to a long and fruitless debate about whether the postulated low “do” belongs to the syllable “Ad,” to the syllable “te,” or to both. There is no “do.” Kl + Mp, which begin with “sol,” only jump down to “re,” and the rather liquefaction-prone Zt is also very restrained here.\\ | ||
| Beginning the IN with “sol” corresponds to the more recent theory that a piece should begin with the same note with which it ends (finalis). | Beginning the IN with “sol” corresponds to the more recent theory that a piece should begin with the same note with which it ends (finalis). | ||
| - | {{ :grad:0001_ad_te.png?320|}} | + | {{ :gr_indiv:0002_ad_te.png?320|}} |
| The syllable “te” is a single-tone “fa” in L, Ch, Ang, Y, Mp, in the St. Gallen tradition a kPes (initio debilis?!), whose first tone has hardly a fixed pitch, but is merely a portamento towards “fa.” Thus, Y remains the only witness (A+Bv are missing) for this incipit. The “do” in GR and GrN is an error from the 19th century that has been carried over into the 21st century. | The syllable “te” is a single-tone “fa” in L, Ch, Ang, Y, Mp, in the St. Gallen tradition a kPes (initio debilis?!), whose first tone has hardly a fixed pitch, but is merely a portamento towards “fa.” Thus, Y remains the only witness (A+Bv are missing) for this incipit. The “do” in GR and GrN is an error from the 19th century that has been carried over into the 21st century. | ||
gr_indiv/0002.1754125113.txt.gz · Zuletzt geändert: 2025/08/02 10:58 von xaverkainzbauer