gr_indiv:0002
Unterschiede
Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.
| Beide Seiten der vorigen RevisionVorhergehende Überarbeitung | |||
| gr_indiv:0002 [2026/03/30 19:19] – xaverkainzbauer | gr_indiv:0002 [2026/03/30 19:19] (aktuell) – xaverkainzbauer | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Zeile 28: | Zeile 28: | ||
| The cover pages of many codices have fallen victim to souvenir hunters or other disasters over the centuries; the source material for this IN is therefore sparse. The old (false) prejudice that a cephalicus always has a small secondary note led to a long and fruitless debate about whether the postulated low “do” belongs to the syllable “Ad,” to the syllable “te,” or to both. There is no “do.” Kl + Mp, which begin with “sol,” only jump down to “re,” and the rather liquefaction-prone Zt is also very restrained here.\\ | The cover pages of many codices have fallen victim to souvenir hunters or other disasters over the centuries; the source material for this IN is therefore sparse. The old (false) prejudice that a cephalicus always has a small secondary note led to a long and fruitless debate about whether the postulated low “do” belongs to the syllable “Ad,” to the syllable “te,” or to both. There is no “do.” Kl + Mp, which begin with “sol,” only jump down to “re,” and the rather liquefaction-prone Zt is also very restrained here.\\ | ||
| Beginning the IN with “sol” corresponds to the more recent theory that a piece should begin with the same note with which it ends (finalis). | Beginning the IN with “sol” corresponds to the more recent theory that a piece should begin with the same note with which it ends (finalis). | ||
| - | {{ :grad:0001_ad_te.png?320|}} | + | {{ :gr_indiv:0002_ad_te.png?320|}} |
| The syllable “te” is a single-tone “fa” in L, Ch, Ang, Y, Mp, in the St. Gallen tradition a kPes (initio debilis?!), whose first tone has hardly a fixed pitch, but is merely a portamento towards “fa.” Thus, Y remains the only witness (A+Bv are missing) for this incipit. The “do” in GR and GrN is an error from the 19th century that has been carried over into the 21st century. | The syllable “te” is a single-tone “fa” in L, Ch, Ang, Y, Mp, in the St. Gallen tradition a kPes (initio debilis?!), whose first tone has hardly a fixed pitch, but is merely a portamento towards “fa.” Thus, Y remains the only witness (A+Bv are missing) for this incipit. The “do” in GR and GrN is an error from the 19th century that has been carried over into the 21st century. | ||
gr_indiv/0002.txt · Zuletzt geändert: 2026/03/30 19:19 von xaverkainzbauer