Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

--- an_indiv:1357 [2024/06/08 09:51] – xaverkainzbauer
+++ an_indiv:1357 [2024/11/25 22:09] (aktuell) – xaverkainzbauer
@@ Zeile 9: / Zeile 9: @@
 {%syn:title:ant:1357%}
-[[ant:1357|↖️]]
+[[1356]] ⟽ **[[cento_an:1typ|AN 1]]** ⟾ [[1360]]
+[[ant:1357|⏹️]]
+------
 {{ :an_indiv:1357_analyse.png?370|}}
 Die 1.Periode  besteht aus 1MED triv und 1TER conc, beide Centones sind aber variiert:\\
@@ Zeile 36: / Zeile 39: @@
 -------
+The 1st period consists of 1MED triv and 1TER conc, but both centones are varied:
+"Mihi" The 'levare mediocriter' refers to the first tone: Incipit on "fa", not on "re" or "do" as is usual in the Protus.
+MED triv The usual ascent "fa-sol-la" is replaced by FML alloq, the accent "ví-vere" is exaggerated. The 'sursum' speaks for "si" (vide: "do" in Ka). 1MED triv 2acc becomes 2acc\ (ad "re").
+The second accent becomes "la":
+FML supra
+TER conc The second cento also begins with an augmentation to "la" and thus again:
+(FML supra) The two syllables "mo-ri" are defused with Clv and 'celeriter'. The Clv de-tones, the celeriter prevents spreading.
+The 2nd period is composed along 1TYPOS
+INC ad4 recites like 1MED typ aud "sol", the por "o-por-tet" accelerates over the accent and jumps to "re". This prepares the Clv intonation of the
+FML quia is prepared, the second tone of the Clv is prevented by liquescence. "in cru-ce" The usual pes of the last syllable "sol-la" is replaced by FML circulatio, a valorisation that the Lord's cross certainly deserves:
+circulatio.
+TER clv begins with the falling line "la-sol-fa", which belongs to both 1NOV type and 1TER. The cento 1TER clv expands the text, "domini mei iesu christe" must by no means be neglected.
+{%syn:analyse:ant:1357%}