Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

--- an_indiv:1210 [2024/06/14 09:04] – xaverkainzbauer
+++ an_indiv:1210 [2024/11/25 19:32] (aktuell) – xaverkainzbauer
@@ Zeile 9: / Zeile 9: @@
 {%syn:title:ant:1210%}
-[[ant:1210|↖️]]
+[[1209]] ⟽ **[[cento_an:1typ|AN 1]]** ⟾ [[1211]]
+[[ant:1210|⏹️]] [[rp_hmr:1210|🔄]]
+-------
 **[[cento_an:2inc_cad|2INC cad]]** +
 [[formulae:pecl|FML PeCl]] <fc #4682b4>"crucis"</fc>\\
@@ Zeile 18: / Zeile 19: @@
 **[[cento_an:1ter_vadd#1|1TER v.add]]**.\\
 {{:an_indiv:1210_comm_1.png?200 |}}
 <fc #4682b4>"Per signum crucis"</fc>
@@ Zeile 40: / Zeile 40: @@
 **[[cento_an:2inc_cad|2INC cad]]** +
-[[formulae:pecl|FML PeCl]] <fc #4682b4>"crucis"</fc>\
+[[formulae:pecl|FML PeCl]] <fc #4682b4>"crucis"</fc>\\
-**[[cento_an:1nov_typ#3|1NOV typ]]** variatio. in MR 1MED triv, item variatio.\\\
+**[[cento_an:1nov_typ#3|1NOV typ]]** variatio. in MR 1MED triv, item variatio.\\
 **[[cento_an:1ter_vadd#1|1TER v.add]]**.\\
 {{:an_indiv:1210_comm_1.png?200 |}}
 <fc #4682b4>"Per signum crucis"</fc>
 Bv expands the text and thus has enough syllables for a classical four-part type of the 1st mode. The other sources have to make do with 5 syllables. If the VrgStr on the first syllable is taken seriously, it must be a "re" (AM!) and introduce the cento 1INC VrgStr. The ending of the cento with PeCl in place of the final "re" is also beyond question. The two syllables "sig-num" remain. If you underlay the shortest cento 1INC VrgStr (0269), the notes "do-re-fa-mi" remain. The "mi" is prevented by the cephalic "sig-//num//", the notes "do-re" remain for the kPes.\\