Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

--- an_indiv:0856 [2024/11/04 10:50] – xaverkainzbauer
+++ an_indiv:0856 [2024/11/23 21:07] (aktuell) – xaverkainzbauer
@@ Zeile 9: / Zeile 9: @@
 {%syn:title:ant:0856%}
-[[ant:0856|⏺️]] [[rp_hmr:0856|🔄]]
+[[ant:0856|⏹️]] [[rp_hmr:0856|🔄]]
+-------
 **[[cento_an:1inc_5pes#6|1INC 5Pes]]** Zwei Akzente "**mít**tens **háec** mulier".\\
 **[[cento_an:1ter_clv#2|1TER Clv]]** <fc #4682b4>"in"</fc> die namengebende Neume Clv ist unterdrückt: breiter Stau vor <fc #4682b4>"corpus meum"</fc>.\\
@@ Zeile 30: / Zeile 30: @@
 **[[cento_an:1inc_5pes#6|1INC 5Pes]]** Two accents “**mít**tens **háec** mulier”.\\
-**[[cento_an:1ter_clv#2|1TER Clv]]** <fc #4682b4>“in”</fc> the eponymous neume Clv is suppressed: broad congestion before <fc #4682b4>“corpus meum”</fc>.\\
+**[[cento_an:1ter_clv#2|1TER Clv]]** <fc #4682b4>“in”</fc> the eponymous neume Clv is suppressed: broad congestion before <fc #4682b4>“corpus meum”</fc>.\\**[[cento_an:1inc_ad4#1|1INC ad4]]** <fc #4682b4>“hoc”</fc> The entire ascent to the Ténor level “sol” is placed in this single syllable. In MR+Wc,Fo, but also Tol a mere salicus “re-fa-sol”, H writes four tones. The comparison with [[ant:0548]] “spem” leads to our solution.\\
-**[[cento_an:1inc_ad4#1|1INC ad4]]** <fc #4682b4>“hoc”</fc> The entire ascent to the Ténor level “sol” is placed in this single syllable. In MR+Wc,Fo, but also Tol a mere salicus, only H writes four tones.\\
 <fc #4682b4>“un//guén//tum”</fc> The accented syllable is a PorFlx urgens et liqueszens. The 'urgens' is notated in MR as initio debilis (rounded beginning of the torculus graph), in Fo+Tol this 'tone' is missing.
 The neume por drives the melodic flow further, but the liquescent flexus expands and costs the word 'unguentum' afterwards.