Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

--- an_indiv:0048 [2025/09/09 10:51] – xaverkainzbauer
+++ an_indiv:0048 [2025/09/09 10:52] (aktuell) – xaverkainzbauer
@@ Zeile 31: / Zeile 31: @@
 and gather together the dispersed of Israel.
 -------
+**[[cento_an:1inc_vrgstr#2|1INC VrgStr]]** PPO with [[neumen:litterae|exspectare]]\\
-**[[cento_an:1inc_vrgstr|1INC VrgStr]]** cum [[neumen:litterae|exspectare]]\\
+**[[cento_an:1med_triv#1|1MED triv]]** 2acc M, [[neumen:litterae#c_st_x|exspectare]] +
-**[[cento_an:1med_triv|1MED triv]]** 2acc M, [[neumen:litterae#c_st_x|exspectare]] +
 [[neumen:oriscus:vrg#vrg_mut|~Vrg mut]] at the beginning of the next cento:\\
-**[[cento_an:1nov_typ#geg|1NOV typ]]** 2acc\\
+**[[cento_an:1nov_typ#geg|1NOV typ]]**  2acc\\
-**[[cento_an:1ter_conc|1TER conc]]** \\
+<fc #4682b4>“//et// congregabit”</fc> Except in T2, always only one note. The ‘exspectare’ signals the cento transition, so the VrgStr is superfluous in this sense. After the previous “fa,” there must be a virga on the syllable ‘et’ to indicate the following lower “mi.” The suspicion arises that the VStr here refers to a higher note than before, a “sol” (contrary to all sources!). One possible function of the VStr, especially in the 2nd mode, is to indicate the third leap (see Cento 2INC cad). That is //one// reason for “sol.” The second reason is that the Cento 1NOV type begins with “sol.”
+This result cannot be achieved without centology, only from the manuscripts.
 -------
 {%syn:analyse:ant:0048%}