gr_indiv:0345
Unterschiede
Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.
| Beide Seiten der vorigen RevisionVorhergehende ÜberarbeitungNächste Überarbeitung | Vorhergehende Überarbeitung | ||
| gr_indiv:0345 [2025/07/16 19:32] – xaverkainzbauer | gr_indiv:0345 [2026/03/17 08:57] (aktuell) – xaverkainzbauer | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
| - | [[cento: | + | [[cento: |
| - | <fc # | + | |
| [[0325|1️⃣]] [[0323|2️⃣]] [[0290|3️⃣]] ✅ [[0298|5️⃣]] [[0310|6️⃣]] [[0396|7️⃣]] [[0324|8️⃣]] | [[0325|1️⃣]] [[0323|2️⃣]] [[0290|3️⃣]] ✅ [[0298|5️⃣]] [[0310|6️⃣]] [[0396|7️⃣]] [[0324|8️⃣]] | ||
| - | <fc # | + | <fc # |
| - | [[ant: | + | |
| ------------------ | ------------------ | ||
| - | |||
| [[0344]] ← → [[0348]] | [[0344]] ← → [[0348]] | ||
| - | |||
| {%syn: | {%syn: | ||
| - | GT 23 - GN 1/14 - BzG 21/31 <fc # | + | [[0342]] ⟽ **[[cento_gr: |
| + | [[0342]] ⟽ **[[cento_gr: | ||
| + | <fc # | ||
| ------- | ------- | ||
| - | {{ : | + | {{ : |
| Das GrN behält in diesem Typus-Alleluia | Das GrN behält in diesem Typus-Alleluia | ||
| Hier ist zu erinnern, was Luigi Agustoni zum si im Deuterus festhält: | Hier ist zu erinnern, was Luigi Agustoni zum si im Deuterus festhält: | ||
| “//h// in Bezug zu //do// oder unterem //mi//, //b// in Bezug zu unterem // | “//h// in Bezug zu //do// oder unterem //mi//, //b// in Bezug zu unterem // | ||
| - | ------- | ||
| - | V. Erwecke, Herr, deine gewaltige Macht / und komm, um uns heil zu machen! | ||
| - | V. Awaken, Lord, your mighty power / and come to make us whole! | + | V. Erwecke, Herr, deine gewaltige Macht / und komm, um uns heil zu machen! |
| - | ------- | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| The GrN retains the si-be-molle (b) in this type alleluia; despite the ‘do’ in cl. Why? Wasn't the intention to engage in an aesthetic debate between a taste characterised by the sultry harmonies of the late 19th century and listening habits that have gone through the school of atonality? A perfect fourth that ‘dissolves’ into a diminished fifth is supposed to be more beautiful than a tritone that dissolves into a perfect fifth? \\ | The GrN retains the si-be-molle (b) in this type alleluia; despite the ‘do’ in cl. Why? Wasn't the intention to engage in an aesthetic debate between a taste characterised by the sultry harmonies of the late 19th century and listening habits that have gone through the school of atonality? A perfect fourth that ‘dissolves’ into a diminished fifth is supposed to be more beautiful than a tritone that dissolves into a perfect fifth? \\ | ||
| Here we should remember what Luigi Agustoni writes about si in the Deuterus: | Here we should remember what Luigi Agustoni writes about si in the Deuterus: | ||
gr_indiv/0345.1752687174.txt.gz · Zuletzt geändert: von xaverkainzbauer
