Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

--- gr_indiv:0133 [2024/08/22 21:09] – georgwais
+++ gr_indiv:0133 [2026/03/22 12:13] (aktuell) – xaverkainzbauer
@@ Zeile 1: / Zeile 1: @@
-[[cento:centologia#centones_missalis|🔘]] **<fc #BD0C11>IN</fc>** [[grad:0202|GR]] [[grad:0465|TR]] [[grad:0294|AL]] [[grad:0481|OF]] [[grad:0599|CO]]
+[[cento:centologia#centones_missalis|🔘]] **<fc #BD0C11>IN</fc>** [[grad:0202|GR]] [[grad:0465|TR]] [[grad:0294|AL]] [[grad:0481|OF]] [[grad:0599|CO]] <fc #ffffff>xxxxx</fc>
-<fc #ffffff>xxxxx</fc>
 [[0017|1️⃣]] [[0011|2️⃣]] [[0006|3️⃣]] ✅ [[0012|5️⃣]] [[0008|6️⃣]] [[0003|7️⃣]] [[0002|8️⃣]]
-<fc #ffffff>xxxxx</fc>
+<fc #ffffff>xxxxx</fc> [[ant:0113|AN]] [[ant:7016|RP]] [[ant:9921|IV]]  [[alia:alia|alia]]
-[[ant:0113|AN]] [[ant:7016|RP]] [[ant:9921|IV]]  [[alia:alia|alia]]
 ------------------
+[[0132]] ← → [[0135]]
-====== 0133 ======
+{%syn:title:grad:0133%}
+[[0128]] ⟽ **[[cento_gr:cento_in4|IN 4]]** ⟾ [[0138]] <fc #ffffff>xxx</fc>  [[grad:0133|⏹️]]
-[[grad:0133|↖️]] \\
+ <fc #ffffff>xxx</fc>GT 196 - GN 165 - BzG 29/7
+-------
-GT 196\\
-BzG 29/7 + GrN 165
 **[[formulae:trc_int#trcint|TrcINT]]**\\
 Außer Kl + E haben alle anderen Quellen den TrcINT zur Clivis reduziert.
@@ Zeile 22: / Zeile 17: @@
 <fc #4682b4>//"al//-le-//lu//-ia 3" (von 4)</fc> Nur Ch schreibt liqueszenzlose Noten, alle anderen, vor allem E und L, aber auch Bv notieren (leichte) Liqueszenz. Dem GN ist zu widersprechen. \\
 Das sursum bei der Schlaufe des ersten Cephalicus fordert auf, diese Liqueszenz durchaus "saftig" zu singen.
+  Ich bin auferstanden und bin immer bei dir. Halleluja.
+  Du hast deine Hand auf mich gelegt. Halleluja.
+  Wie wunderbar ist für mich dieses Wissen. Halleluja, Halleluja.
+  I am risen and am with you always. Hallelujah.
+  You have laid your hand on me. Hallelujah.
+  How wonderful this knowledge is for me. Hallelujah, hallelujah.
+**[[formulae:trc_int#trcint|TrcINT]]**\\
+Apart from Kl + E, all other sources have reduced the TrcINT to Clivis.
+<fc #4682b4>“//et// adhuc”</fc> The intonation torculus is reduced to clivis in all other sources except Kl +. In Kl, the Trc follows the syllable before in unison (re-fa-mi). The inferius in E, however, speaks for do-fa-mi.
+The intonation torculus is basically a fourth upbeat. Since the first note is “so light that it can be dropped”, in other words it is only a portamento, an entry sound that cannot be assigned a specific pitch, its notation as a fourth, third or fifth [[grad:0599]] is insignificant. We always write the intonation torculus as a fourth, without wanting to assign a specific pitch**place** to the first note. E supports this approach with its inferius.
+<fc #4682b4>“scien-//ti//-a”</fc> Basically, the tristropha is the neume that raises a “si” to a “do” ( mi to fa). (cf.et.: Resur-**rexi**”, ‘super **me ma**-num’, ‘tu-**am al**-leluia’, ‘mirabi-**lis fac**-ta’. This is always the case in L and Ch. Bv34, A and Y also attest to this, while the more recent sources Kl, Zw, Mod, Mp are already subject to the do revision. In “mirabi-**lis fac**-ta”, Y has also already gone the way of “fa”, in “scienti-**a tu**-a” even Bv34 has been converted to “fa”, but not A. Bv33 is probably to be read as “mi”, although the passage has been erased, but Bv40, 39, 35 all write “fa”.
+<fc #4682b4>///“al//-le-//lu//-ia 3” (of 4)</fc> Only Ch writes liquescent notes, all others, especially E and L, but also Bv write (slight) liquescence. The GN must be contradicted. \\
+The sursum at the loop of the first cephalicus calls for this liquescence to be sung “juicily”.
+--------
+{%syn:analyse:grad:0133%}