Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

--- gr_indiv:0047 [2025/04/01 11:56] – xaverkainzbauer
+++ gr_indiv:0047 [2025/04/01 11:57] (aktuell) – xaverkainzbauer
@@ Zeile 37: / Zeile 37: @@
 Your face, Lord, I will seek. Do not turn your face from me, alleluia, alleluia.
 -------
+{{ :gr_indiv:0047_incipit.png?300|}}
+<fc #4682b4>“Ego autem”</fc> Classical incipit of the 3rd mode. Unison salicus “mi-mi-fa” followed by pes “re-sol”.\\
+<fc #4682b4>“autem”</fc> The circulatio figure around “la” shows the entire breadth of melodic development from the 10th to the 13th century. MR, Y, Kl, Mp join the neume in unison with the previous pes and therefore begin with “sol”. “la” as the first note can be read without doubt in Ch, A, Ben, Zw, Mod, but above all in E through the ‘altius’. The falling line “si-la-sol” is out of the question. The ascent to “do” in Kl, Zw, Mod, Mp is do-revision. In Y, it is probably just an exchange of the two summit tones of the neume.\\
+The actual theme is the ascent to “do” at the end of the syllable “au-”. Ch simply fills the space “sol-do” (plerosis), MR does not. The quilisma forces the next note at least a third higher. It is not clear whether the bivirga graph at the end is “si-do” as in A, or bivirga “do-do” as in Zw. Kl and Mod also indulge in plerosis, The solution in Mp “sol-la-do” contradicts the position of the quilisma in E, so only MR remains as a witness for E if the bivirga is “si-do”.
+{{:gr_indiv:0047_circulatio.png?350 |}}
+The logic of the neume “autem” is to be understood from the FML Circulatio. It is not uncommon for the circulatio to be extended forwards in the 3rd mode (e.g. IN 0116 //fe//-cisti, 0037 spi-//ritum//, 0042 al-//le//-luia), as in this IN with “domo”. If the circulatio is not curved, as is almost always the case in MR, it jumps up after the low point. However, since “autem” is followed by recitationj “si”, the ascent must lead to “so”. This means that the oriscus applicatus here is an oriscus superans, drawing the tone to the tenor “do”.
+<fc #4682b4>“fructi-//fi//-cavi”</fc> Bv and Mp lead the Clm to “mi”. The following virga in Bam also speaks for “mi”, as do Ch (imperfect diastemia) and MR (gravis).
+<fc #4682b4>“dei //me//-i”</fc> The summit tone (si or sa) is related to the preceding “do”, not to the lower “fa”, hence “si”.
+**[[formulae:trc_int#trcint|TrcINT]]**\\
+<fc #4682b4>“an-//te// conspectum”</fc> Ch + E notate Trc, L is missing. The early diastematic sources, Benevento and Aquitaine are reduced to Clv. The letters in E are interesting. They clearly define the intonation torculus in our sense: the tone before the Trc is “inferius mediocriter” a “la”. The first note of the Trc is “inferius” therefore “sol”.
 {%syn:analyse:grad:0047%}