Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

--- an_indiv:1360 [2024/06/08 10:39] – xaverkainzbauer
+++ an_indiv:1360 [2024/11/25 22:12] (aktuell) – xaverkainzbauer
@@ Zeile 9: / Zeile 9: @@
 {%syn:title:ant:1360%}
-[[ant:1360|↖️]]
-{{ :ant:1360_comm200.png?300|}}
+[[1358]] ⟽ **[[cento_an:8typ|AN 8]]** ⟾ [[1361]]
+[[ant:1360|⏹️]]
+--------
+{{ :ant:1360_comm200.png?350|}}
 **[[cento_an:1inc_vrgstr|1INC VrgStr]]** \\
@@ Zeile 20: / Zeile 23: @@
 **[[cento_an:1ter_conc|1TER conc]]**  \\
 <fc #4682b4>"consum)-mávi"</fc> +  <fc #4682b4>"fidem ser)-vávi"</fc> Die Liqueszenz staut vor dem Akzent und betont ihn damit zusätzlich.
 -------
@@ Zeile 32: / Zeile 33: @@
 -------
+**[[cento_an:1inc_vrgstr|1INC VrgStr]]** \\
+The text has an atypical background. In "Bonum certamen certávi", the meaning-bearing syllable (the morpheme) <fc #4682b4>"**cer**-tá-vi"</fc> lies on the main tone "re", the word accent on the unstressed passing tone "mi", thus emphasising the perfect tense (the completion, the finished state of the battle).\\
+<fc #4682b4>"Bonum"</fc> is completely de-accented (celeriter, so the VrgStr is missing ?). The clivis <fc #4682b4>"certa-**vi** cursum consummatum"</fc> connects and drives on.\\
+**[[cento_an:1med_triv|1MED triv]]** \\
+**[[cento_an:1ter_conc|1TER conc]]** \\
+<fc #4682b4>"consum)-mávi"</fc> + <fc #4682b4>"fidem ser)-vávi"</fc> The liquescence builds up before the accent, emphasising it further.
+{%syn:analyse:ant:1360%}