Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

--- an_indiv:0185 [2025/03/28 11:06] – xaverkainzbauer
+++ an_indiv:0185 [2025/03/28 11:07] (aktuell) – xaverkainzbauer
@@ Zeile 25: / Zeile 25: @@
 Der Cento endet mit variierter FML retrard. Der letzte Ton führt nicht zum "do" sondern nur zum "re", um Platz zu lassen für den folgenden Pes "do-re". Das wird in H durch den applizierten Oriscus angezeigt und in allen diastematischen Quellen (außer Lc) bestätigt. Der applizierte Oriscus ist hier 'submittens'. MR notiert das nicht. \\
 [[formulae:retard|FML retard]] MR ist als Normalfall zu lesen Clm-Bewegung "fa-mi-do". Aber was bedeutet der Oriscus applicatus in H ? Bedeutet er eine a) zusätzliche Resupinbewegung zum "re" zurück, oder verkürzt er b) die Clm-Bewegung zu "fa-mi-re"? Dann aber ist er kein eigener Ton mehr, sondern c) Signal, dass der folgende Cento tiefer beginnt.
 **[[cento_an:2inc_asc#10|2INC asc]]**+ \\
@@ Zeile 36: / Zeile 35: @@
 and brought forth the King of kings.
 -------
-The antiphon begins with two endings! <fc #4682b4>"Virgo verbo concépit"</fc>. <fc #4682b4>"Virgo permansit"</fc>. Full stop. That's it, that's it. The syllable "con-cé-pit" leads to "fa" (H qulisma and 'sursum'), see T2, but not Bv. AMn turns the virga qulismatica into a terzpes, which contradicts its own rules (bivirga or semitone pes!). The virga strata also becomes a bivirga, contrary to all sources.
+The antiphon begins with two endings! <fc #4682b4>“Virgo verbo concépit”</fc>. <fc #4682b4>“Virgo permansit”</fc>. Punktum. That's the end of it. The syllable “con-cé-pit” leads to “fa” (H Qulisma and 'sursum'), see T2, but not Bv. AMn turns the virga qulismatica into a terzpes, which contradicts its own rules (bivirga or semitone pes!). The virga strata also becomes a bivirga, against all sources.
-**[[cento_an:2ter_typ|2TER typ]]** + [[neumen:oriscus:vrg#vrg_mut|~Vrg mut]]\\
+**[[cento_an:2ter_typ|2nd type]]** + [[neumen:oriscus:vrg#vrg_mut|~Vrg mut]]\\
-**[[cento_an:2ter_typ|2TER typ]]** ad "fa" [[neumen:oriscus:vrg#vrg_mut|~Trc mut]] vide Ka + T2.\\
+<fc #4682b4>“con-//cé-pit//”</fc> Last accent: Quilisma +'sursum' in H, ergo ad “fa”. The AMn is supported here by Ben against Tol. Last syllable: the virga strata in H (MR Virga) is not transmitted as a two-note virga in any diastematic source.\\
+**[[cento_an:2ter_typ|2TER typ]]** ad “fa” [[neumen:oriscus:vrg#vrg_mut|~Trc mut]] vide Ka + T2.\\
 {{ :an_indiv:0185_fml_retard.png?200|}}
-**[[cento_an:1med_triv#acc2|1MED triv]]** 2accent with Quartfall.\\
+**[[cento_an:1med_triv#acc2|1MED triv]]** 2 accented with quartfall.\\
-[[formulae:retard|FML retard]] MR is to be read as normal case Clm-movement "fa-mi-do". But what does the oriscus applicatus in H mean? Does it mean a) an additional resupine movement back to the "re", or does it b) shorten the Clm movement to "fa-mi-re"? But then it is no longer a separate note, but c) a signal that the following cento begins lower.
+The Cento ends with varied FML retard. The last tone does not lead to “do” but only to “re”, to leave room for the following pes “do-re”. This is indicated in H by the applied Oriscus and confirmed in all diastematic sources (except Lc). The applied Oriscus is 'submittens' here. MR does not note this. \\
+[[formulae:retard|FML retard]] MR is to be read as the normal case Clm movement “fa-mi-do”. But what does the Oriscus applicatus mean in H? Does it mean a) an additional Resupin movement back to “re”, or does it shorten b) the Clm movement to “fa-mi-re”? But then it is no longer a tone in its own right, but c) a signal that the following cento begins lower.
-**[[cento_an:2inc_asc#10|2INC asc]]**+ \\
-**[[cento_an:1ter_conc#3|1TER conc]]**, Only the last syllable reaches the flinalis [[formulae:colon]]?
 -------
 {%syn:analyse:ant:0185%}