Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

--- an_indiv:0176 [2024/09/07 08:31] – xaverkainzbauer
+++ an_indiv:0176 [2024/11/12 18:20] (aktuell) – xaverkainzbauer
@@ Zeile 9: / Zeile 9: @@
 {%syn:title:ant:0176%}
-[[ant:0176|↖️]]
+[[0174]] ⟽ **[[cento_an:1typ|AN 1]]** ⟾ [[0188]]
+[[ant:0176|⏹️]] [[rp_hmr:0176|🔄]]
+-------
 {{ :an_indiv:0176_oc-or_sanctorum.png?200|}}
 **[[cento_an:1inc_5pes|1INC 5Pes]]** Auf den Akzent folgen auf "la" rezitierend vier (!) episemierte Virgen,\\
@@ Zeile 38: / Zeile 41: @@
 -------
-**[[cento_an:1inc_5pes|1INC 5Pes]]** The accent is followed by four (!) episemised virgues reciting "la",\\
+{{ :an_indiv:0176_oc-or_sanctorum.png?200|}}
-"Tecum pri-//cípium in di//-e → virtútis tuae". This is followed by a [[neumen:neuma#porrectus|Porrectus]]. What follows can be interpreted in two ways: as\\
+**[[cento_an:1inc_5pes|1INC 5Pes]]** The accent is followed by four (!) episemic virgins reciting on “la”,\\
+“Tecum pri-//cípium in di//-e → virtútis tuae”. This is followed by a [[neumen:neuma#porrectus|Porrectus]]. What follows can be interpreted in two ways: as\\
 **[[cento_an:1med_triv|1MED triv]]** unaccented to the re, or as\\\
 **[[formulae:supra|FML supra]]**.\\
-Now the antiphon establishes a new level of recitation: "fa", which begins with the \\
+Now the antiphon establishes a new level of recitation: “fa”, which begins with the \\
-**[[formulae:solmido|FML SolMiDo]]** is transformed to "re" +
+**[[formulae:solmido|FML SolMiDo]]** is transformed into “re” +
-[[neumen:oriscus:pct#pct_sub|~Pct sub]]
+[[neumen:oriscus:pct#pct_sub|~Pct sub]]\\
+<fc #4682b4>“sancto-//rum//”</fc> The ˜punctum on the final syllable takes it back. The imperfect diastemia of H forces a “do”. MR does not work here. Repeating the lowest note 'do' is unusual. Tol avoids this by making the syllable <fc #4682b4>“ex”</fc> “re” again.
-{{ :ant:0176_comm.png?300|}}
+**[[cento_an:2inc_asc|2INC asc]]** “ex utero” is strongly intercepted by two episemized virgules (emphasized: “ex ú-**te-ro**”) and [[neumen:litterae#c_st_x|exspectare]]. \\
+**[[formulae:supra|FML supra]]** or, again ambiguous\\
 **[[cento_an:2inc_asc|2INC asc]]** "ex utero" is strongly intercepted by two episemised virgins (emphasised: "ex ú-**te-ro**") and [[neumen:litterae#c_st_x|exspectare]]. \\
 **[[formulae:supra|FML supra]]** or, again ambiguous\\
+{{ :ant:0176_comm.png?320|}}
 **[[cento_an:1MED triv]]** [[neumen:litterae#l|levare]] indicates that the accent is higher than merely an accentual pes from the recitation "fa". The melodic solution for "génui té" is elegantly two-accented, the last accent is oxytonone. If "génui" is set to music normally, a false accent "genuí" is produced. If the "té" is set to music normally, the accent "génui" is lost. The "composer" solves the dilemma by placing "gé-nui" on the finalis, which is secured and reinforced as an accent by cephalicus, but then descends again from "fa" to the second accent "genui //té//", also "re".
 -------
 {%syn:analyse:ant:0176%}