Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

--- an_indiv:0152 [2024/06/15 16:53] – xaverkainzbauer
+++ an_indiv:0152 [2024/11/12 17:37] (aktuell) – xaverkainzbauer
@@ Zeile 9: / Zeile 9: @@
 {%syn:title:ant:0152%}
-[[ant:0152|↖️]]
+[[0146]] ⟽ **[[cento_an:1typ|AN 1]]** ⟾ [[0170]]
+[[ant:0152|⏹️]] [[rp_hmr:0152|🔄]]
+-------
 **[[cento_an:1med_triv#m|1MED triv]]** 2acc M\\
 [[neumen:litterae#c_st_x|exspectare]] trennt <fc #4682b4>"Diffusa est"</fc> von <fc #4682b4>"gratia"</fc>, das selbst untypisch über "mi" zum "sol" steigt: [[formulae:colon]]. Deshalb beginnt\\
@@ Zeile 30: / Zeile 33: @@
 -------
+**[[cento_an:1med_triv#m|1MED triv]]** 2acc M\\
+[[neumen:litterae#c_st_x|exspectare]] separates <fc #4682b4>"Diffusa est"</fc> from <fc #4682b4>"gratia"</fc>, which itself rises atypically above "mi" to "sol": [[formulae:colon]]. Therefore begins\\
+**[[cento_an:1ter_conc|1TER conc]]** unusually begins with "mi". The oriscus in the place of a virga deharmonises the syllable: <fc #4682b4>"in lábis tuis"</fc> \\
+**[[cento_an:2inc_asc#6|2INC asc]]** <fc #4682b4>"benedixit te"</fc> falling line to "do": [[formulae:colon]].\\
+**[[cento_an:1ter_de3#2|1TER de3]]**\\
+<fc #4682b4>"de-us"</fc> Virga quilismata. Is the quilisma a tone?  Fo, Ka, Zw write a pes "mi-fa" and render the quilisma as a tone \\
+As is so often the case, Bv writes a clivis "fa-mi", which can certainly be interpreted as a solution, but does not transfer the quilisma as a tone, at most saving the supposed number of tones. \\
+MR, Wc, T1+T2 write //no// tone (fa) for the quilisma.
 -------
 {%syn:analyse:ant:0152%}